Anthropocene

2020

Action / Thriller

7
IMDb Rating 3.6/10 10 120 120

Please enable your VPΝ when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPΝ, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Guard VPΝ

Plot summary

Claire, a lone girl treks the new, dangerous wasteland, ravaged by famine and a virus, in search of food and clean water.

Director

Emir Skalonja Photo
Emir Skalonja

Top cast

Ron Emerson Photo
Ron Emerson as Masked Thug
Kimber Lee Photo
Kimber Lee as Thug
Cryss Marie Photo
Cryss Marie as Thug
Maria Eleyna Photo
Maria Eleyna as Thug
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
758.53 MB
1280*714
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
29.97 fps
1 hr 22 min
Seeds ...
1.37 GB
1920*1072
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles us  
29.97 fps
1 hr 22 min
Seeds ...

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by fred-sickly 5 / 10

I'd throw a few big-name directors under a bus before slamming this film too hard.

I get the feeling that the only person who wrote a review of this film that knew the slightest bit about making a film is Ron Emerson. (We know he does, since he was in this. Good on him for supporting the project.)YES: This has several spotty bits of audio and the occasional unintentional audio ruffle or camera bounce. YES: It's pretty short on plot. YES: The acting isn't always "perfect," though in some places, it's better than in a ton of movies that came out this year with budgets 1000 times larger. SURE: The costumes, make-up, props, and colour grading are a little thin. FINE. It has a few holes in it.All of that aside, it is quite an achievement, considering the budget. There are households that are getting excited to go spend more money on a pair of crappy, shiny, boring, new iPhones this year. If their estimated budget is even close to accurate, they did alright with it. Really. Their $2,100 budget is the same as John Waters' "Mondo Trasho." Is it as "good" and "entertaining" a film as "Mondo Trasho?" Maybe not. But it shows a ton of potential. $2,100 went a bit further back in 1969, and perhaps a lot of the crew on that film had a bit more experience or "vision."The fact that they finished this production says a lot right there. A guerilla filmmaker just starting out could learn a ton from this film, as I'm sure everyone who worked on it did. I would definitely watch what they do next. Anyone with a budget so small should be so lucky with their results. At the end of the day, a lot of people spent their time and money on a couch, playing arcade games that are lamer than this film, on a wee, handheld rectangle, while this cast and crew went out and made a film. It's not a "great" film, sure. But, their next one could be, with a little more time put into the script and editing, a tighter pre-production, and maybe a slight hike in the budget.I'm sure that next time, they'll do better. And that's definitely enough for me, from a crew dedicated enough to actually finish and release a film. It's not for everyone, sure. While not as polished, I'd say it couldn't be any worse than Zemeckis' past 6 films put together, and if you want that "polish" on your movies for your sit-around time, go waste your time on another soulless Zemeckis or Spielberg cartoon.I gave this 5 stars. And it earned every one of them. While, Zemeckis spent millions of dollars making "Marwen" and "Witches," a pair of paper tigers whose productions did little more than waste time, talent, and resources on a grander scale. If it's not "fair" to compare the productions -- which may relatively be true -- I put this film on yesterday, after another indie low/no budget movie (to remain nameless here) that was less satisfying and showed less potential. Maybe that other crew had a bigger budget and had attended a few more film classes, but, while that film's acting and sound were cleaner, it had a more muddled plot, annoying colour grading, less "heart," horrible pacing, said less, and even obviously had (important) shots missing, as though the director had just forgotten to point a camera at the film's centerpiece, which was, confusingly, simply never shown... And the budget for that film was over 10 grand.A little rewrite and a little more time in post-production might have bumped this up an easy few stars, for me. But they did a good job. As worth a watch as over 2/3 of what came out in 2020.
Reviewed by

Reviewed by andyonmob 3 / 10

Crap

Didnt make it past 30 minutes then a quick fast forward to check it is all the same. Somebodys attempt at a do-it-yourself movie making project. If you really have nothing better to do like clipping your toenails then give it a watch. Every experience adds something to life.

Read more IMDb reviews

12 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment