I saw a modern remake of this film, 1989, recently with Kenneth Branagh. The battle showed sweat and blood, a non-theatrical production in comparison to this 1944, very theatrical, Olivier production. Some reviewers denounce the heavy-handed acting of 1944, but I find it charming.
Olivier has an economical charisma. His acting has few flourishes, but his voice says everything. Olivier in period costume is mesmerizing. As Shakespeare's bad-boy prince turned earnest King, Olivier takes charge and demands the return of English lands from the rather effeminate French nobility. Outnumbered 10 to one, his merry band of Englishmen dispatches the Dolphin at Agincourt. Then he courts the French speaking princess Katherine with broken French and economy.
The recreation of old London and the Globe Theatre was delightful. The audience and players went on in heavy rains without complaint. The mention of Falstaff's name is enough to get applause, though the buffoon has only a short death scene.
I do believe the play has been abridged. Many of the longer speeches seem shortened. Still, this is accessible Shakespeare. How can you go wrong? Never!
Henry V
1944
Action / Biography / Drama / History / War
Henry V
1944
Action / Biography / Drama / History / War
Plot summary
In the midst of the Hundred Years' War, the young King Henry V of England embarks on the conquest of France in 1415.
Uploaded by: FREEMAN
February 15, 2021 at 05:15 AM
Director
Top cast
Tech specs
720p.BLU 1080p.BLUMovie Reviews
Elegant
A very impressive film
I don't know which out of this film from Laurence Olivier and Kenneth Branagh's film I prefer because I do put them on an equal level. Though I am not sure whether I'd go as far to say that either film is their best overall work as director, for me Olivier's was Richard III and Branagh's was Much Ado About Nothing. If I were to make any preferences, Branagh's conveys the brutality of war more evocatively than Olivier's, which was glossed over in comparison and has the better reading of the St Crispin's Day speech, while Olivier's has the better music score and the better costumes and sets. I consider the directing and lead performances equal too. Anyway enough with the comparisons. Under review here is Olivier's film, and I have to say that it is a truly impressive one, great even, especially considering that it was Olivier's debut as director. If there is anything that I wasn't so crazy about it was Fluellen's welsh accent which didn't seem all that convincing to me. Everything else though I loved. The costumes and sets are gorgeous, really sumptuous in detail and colourful. The standout was the opening sequence. Then there is William Walton's score, which is magnificently rousing stuff, second to Walton's score for Richard III as far as I'm concerned. Shakespeare's dialogue I have always been compelled by, and it is faithful and brilliantly delivered here. In fact what I love about both Olivier and Branagh's Shakespeare films is how much they respect his writing, same with Orson Welles actually. The story here drew me right in and never bored me even with its length, the opening sequence is wonderful and while not as brutally real as in Branagh's version the battle sequence is still colourfully staged. Olivier's direction is every bit as impressive as the film, even for a first-time director, and he also gives a wonderful performance in the title role. The supporting cast, while not quite on the same level as him, are very good as well, the standouts being Robert Newton(pitch-perfect as Pistol), Esmond Knight(even with the accent, it was still a commanding performance) and Leslie Banks(often coming close to stealing the show). In conclusion, very, very good. 9/10 Bethany Cox