A gang of thieves pick the wrong house to rob and are unwittingly overthrown by the home's owners. They are tasered and transported to a field in the middle of nowhere. They are released by their captors and think that their ordeal is over...little do they know that it's only just beginning....

Despite this film's measly rating I'm going to go on record and state that I actually enjoyed this film for the most part... it was entertaining, short, well-paced and the more the film progressed the more of a power struggle ensued which I liked to see. However, part of me can see why the film is rated quite low on IMDB which, I think it's safe to assume is down to some of the dumbass writing.

Much later in the film it's established that Larry Lamb is in cohoots with Samantha Bond and is setting these thieves up. OK fair enough, but then why does Charlie have to break into the van before they get the ball rolling? Also when he starts the van up it sounds like he's just turning the key suggesting the key was inside the van? Hmmm seems like a good idea to leave a key in the ignition of a vehicle on a lovely neighbourhood as depicted in this film.

So the one chance the thieves have at getting an advantage in the film is when Vix plays possum drawing out the weird barely comprehensible dude. Yet despite this guy being unarmed and there being 3 of them (one armed with a baseball bat) they choose to run?? As opposed to say treble teaming him, beating his ass to a pulp and then I don't know getting the keys from him??????

My personal favourite though for sheer ineptitude is when the Eastern european guy (sorry forgot his name) says "I'll double back, follow tracks and meet you at the farm." Seriously? You think that a bunch of toffs with a bunch of highly trained sniffer dogs whom already have your scent wouldn't know that you had done this??? Let's get real here...

A few minutes later, he removes his tourniquet and discards it which apparently fools the dogs into thinking that they have found his scent. Dogs sense of smell (moreso dogs that are trained for this type of thing) is much more sophisticated than that; removing a tourniquet would not fool a dog and throw it off your scent they would still be able to pick your scent up even if you were in your birthday suit and even discounting body smell what about the tracks that the thieves are leaving everywhere? Even if the dogs somehow don't spot these tracks the highly trained tracker would.

One of the toffs has a perfect killshot, but gets distracted by cars coming round the corner? Seriously on his own family's land he is taken aback by cars coming round the corner I mean who did he expect it to be?

Larry Lamb has a shop full of priceless memorabilia, but doesn't use a shutter to protect his business? In 2022?

I found this film entertaining as I said at the start of my review, but it has more holes in it than swiss cheese which I felt obligated to point out. It's enjoyable when viewed in the right context.

DISHONOURABLE MENTION: James Lance's awful singing.

HONOURABLE MENTION: Chaz for using a perfectly timed and well executed Ghostbusters reference.

So a botched robbery at an estate leads to our four 'naughty children' being hunted across the sprawling lands owned by the 'old posh bird'.

The film itself is OK, but doesn't work when set in the UK. At one point the 'smart' one of the bunch notices tyre tracks on the outside of a field they're running through and proudly announces that there 'must be a farm near by'... Too true there's a farm near by mucker, you've been running through fields (which are part of a farm/numerous farms) for the last couple of hours. It's practically a miracle they've never stumbled across a farm house during this whole time.

There's a moment just after they've been 'freed' where they'd just been covered in fox urine, they've realised it's urine, the 'posh bird' has dropped numerous non subtle hints about not wanting to kill them as it wouldn't be sporting, wished them luck and yet they didn't click that they'd be getting chased? I'm not trying to suggest that i'm a blinding genius, but if i was incapacitated by a bunch of toffs, covered in urine and dumped in a field in the middle of nowhere, i might click onto the fact that urine has a rather pungent odour, particularly to animals and come to a conclusion that i was being marked for reasons which would not be to my benefit.

Despite all of this, it wasn't a disaster of a film, it did have it's moments, though it was overall rather predictable.

British thriller, produced in 2022, with the main theme of manhunt. One of the most common topics. A group breaks into a house for theft and is caught. Then they become the prey of hunters. Although it is not such a high-quality, high-tension movie, it is watched. It is not difficult to predict who will survive, which hunter will die first, and other events within the film. In these, just like in Hollywood movies, jokes can be made 2 minutes later, even if there is a deceased sibling or relative. The ending was not what I expected.

All the characters are repulsive. The most innocent is the first to be sacrificed.

There is no sex or nudity in the movie.