This is the quasi-sequel to Sturges' "Gunfight at the O.K. Corral" and it improves on that film in every way. The Panavision widescreen gives it a more epic scope than "O.K.", and in the ten years between the two films Sturges has also much improved his mise-en-scene. Whereas "O.K." was often unassuming at best and plain dull at worst in its framing (additionally hindered by some obvious studio shots presenting the outdoors), Sturges gets the most out of his shots here. The sequence in which Virgil Earp is gunned down in a dark street is one example. Thankfully enough the dreadful "singing cowboy" songs of "O.K." are nowhere to be heard, instead we have one of Jerry Goldsmith's best scores...and that says something. Acting is also a touch better than in the predecessor. While the Lancaster-Douglas team of "O.K." was indeed that - o.k. - it was bogged down by the repetitious dialogue they were given. Garner and Robards, both somewhat underestimated actors, give fine performances here. And while Robert Ryan as the villainous Ike Clanton is not given much to work with, he makes a reasonable impact as the scheming cattle baron and thief. Finally, and most importantly, the timing of the film is much better than "O.K." which was simply a chore to go through and a bore when one got there. "Hour of the Gun" alternates politics (both sides of the conflict getting the law on their sides, in itself a truthful and interesting account of law and order in the Wild West) and action scenes with Wyatt and comrades pursuing the attackers of his brothers. The depiction of Earp's vigilantism is relatively realistic though the claim of the film to "tell it as it happened" is of course somewhat over-exaggerated, especially concerning the fate of Ike Clanton.

As far as westerns from the end of the golden age of that genre go, "Hour of the Gun" does not rank among the very best, but is a minor treasure nonetheless, a very worthwhile film that tells the events after the famous showdown at the O.K. Corral, and does a very good job of doing so.

I get the biggest kick out of the brief summary of this movie on it's IMDb title page - 'Marshal Wyatt Earp kills a couple of men of the Clanton-gang in a fight'. Really - a fight? Come on - it was the Gunfight at the O.K. Corral!!! Let's give it a little more credit.

Well director John Sturges picked up somewhat where he left off with 1957's "Gunfight at the O.K. Corral". That picture did a pretty good job of defining the relationship between Wyatt Earp and his friend Doc Holliday, a case of a square deal as defined by the lawman. That relationship continues here though not without it's abrasive moments. I liked the idea of Jason Robards portraying Holliday even though he was almost a decade older than his real life counterpart at the time. He seemed to have the right amount of ego and attitude to mirror Holliday's temperament.

The problem I get into with these films is that I tend to focus in on the historical inaccuracies and this one seemed to have it's fair share. Perhaps the biggest one that could have been easily rectified by simply checking was in the spelling of the name 'McLaury'. When the dead men from the Gunfight are put on display, the names of Frank and Tom are spelled 'McLowery'. Virtually any reference source one could look up uses the 'McLaury' spelling.

There are others of course. Students of the Old West will know that Wyatt Earp didn't shoot Ike Clanton in a final showdown; he was killed resisting arrest for cattle rustling some six years following the infamous gunfight. As far as the historical Ike Clanton goes, I don't think you'd have ever caught him wearing a business suit. As a leader of the cowboy faction in the vicinity of Tombstone and along the border to Mexico, Clanton plied his trade of cattle rustling as a rough and tumble outlaw instead of a well spoken citizen.

The main idea the story got right, and one that most film treatments never go into, is that the Earp dominance of Tombstone ended following the events of the O.K. Corral. Wyatt stood trial for murder and was exonerated, while brother Virgil was wounded a couple months later, followed by Morgan's murder in March of 1882. Thus came to be what historians call the 'Earp Vendetta Ride', a term curiously not referred to in the story.

In general though, this movie is a pretty good Western and James Garner does an admirable job as Wyatt Earp, a characterization that's a lot more grim than that of Bret Maverick. I also refer the reader to one of Jon Voight's early screen appearances as Clanton associate Curly Bill Brocius, particularly to an opening scene when he's shown leaning against the wall of the train station. From a different angle it almost looks like the pose he used for the theatrical poster for "Midnight Cowboy".