Jellyfish Eyes

2013 [JAPANESE]

Action / Comedy / Fantasy

2
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 29% · 14 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 42% · 100 ratings
IMDb Rating 4.7/10 10 588 588

Please enable your VPΝ when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPΝ, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Hide VPΝ

Plot summary

In present-day Japan, little Masashi moves from an evacuation center to a small village. There he will discover that every child has the ability to communicate with a fantastic creature, but they are being used in an evil plan to collect the children’s negative energy. Artist Takashi Murakami ‘s debut film is an amazing epic story that is an X-Ray of children’s hopes and fears with the artist’s unmistakable visual style.

720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
933.83 MB
1280*714
Japanese 2.0
NR
Subtitles
23.976 fps
1 hr 41 min
Seeds 2
1.87 GB
1920*1072
Japanese 5.1
NR
Subtitles
23.976 fps
1 hr 41 min
Seeds 4

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by ebossert 1 / 10

Terrible. What was Criterion thinking?

Note: Check me out as the "Asian Movie Enthusiast" on YouTube, where I review tons of Asian movies.Jellyfish Eyes (2013) (Japanese Fantasy Drama/Action) – Children are able to communicate and control fantastical creatures, but they are unknowingly being used in an evil plan to collect negative energy. Bad CGI (computer generated imagery) isn't much of a problem if the rest of the film is good, but in this case it's a big problem because the rest of the film basically sucks. And this is coming from a guy who loves cheesy movies; it's not like a sit around swirling cognac all day, watching nothing but art-house movies on repeat. Heck, "The Boxer's Omen" (1983) is one of my favorite movies of all time! But that movie actually had some charm to it. There's no charm to be found in Jellyfish Eyes . . . because it's really friggin' lazy. There's no character development whatsoever. The performances, in general, are terrible. None of the kids can act and their interactions are obnoxious. I've seen a handful of South Korean films starring Sae-ron Kim and a handful of Japanese films directed by Hirokazu Koreeda – so I know what good child acting looks like. It's not here. The alleged subtext on contemporary Japanese issues is practically non-existent; and even when it does exist, it's shallow and worthless. The director here is apparently a popular artist. Well, I didn't see much artistry here, pal. This is especially true during the monster battles, which were mostly terrible. Now, if you enjoyed this movie then that's great, but I personally haven't been this embarrassed or angry while watching a Japanese movie since I saw Sadako 3D back in 2012. And if you've seen Sadako 3D, you know what I'm talking about. And yes, Jellyfish Eyes is very much on the same level as Sadako 3D. But, you know what? I'll go the extra mile here. If you're interested in a film where humans control little fantastical spirits and use them in battles, go watch the Japanese film "Battle League Horumo" (2009), because it's way better than this.I do have admiration for the Criterion Collection, which is a video-distribution company that has released tons of Japanese films in America. I greatly appreciate their efforts. I really do. However, that doesn't automatically mean that they're immune to criticism. One question that came to mind is this: What on earth was Criterion thinking when they released this steaming turd? Did anyone at Criterion actually watch Jellyfish Eyes before they decided to distribute it in the United States? Of all the great Japanese films that have been released over the last 15 years, Criterion decides to release . . . this. I did a little research and found out that Janus Films acquired the rights to distribute Jellyfish Eyes in North America. And Janus Films apparently has a very close relationship with Criterion regarding the release of their films on DVD. So there you have it. That's your explanation. You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours.Now you may think that I'm overreacting to one noticeably awful decision by Criterion, but there is an obvious trend going on over there. Their mission statement says that they are dedicated to "important classic and contemporary films." And I could easily list over 100 modern Japanese films that are entirely deserving of a Criterion DVD release. Yet for some reason, Criterion is extremely apprehensive at releasing contemporary Japanese films. If you look on their website, they have 191 Japanese films listed in their catalogue. Guess how many of those are post-2000 releases? 2 of them: Still Walking (2008) and Jellyfish Eyes (2013). Taking into consideration their mission statement, what kind of message does that send to their fans? Think about this for a second. Criterion is dedicated to "important classic and contemporary films" yet 189 of the 191 Japanese films listed on their website library are films that were made before the year 2000. That tells me, that Criterion is either completely ignorant of modern Japanese film, or they simply don't think that modern Japanese films are worthy of distribution. As a fan of both classic and contemporary Japanese cinema, that kinda rubs me the wrong way.Listen, Criterion can release whatever films they want, but the fact that they almost completely ignore the plethora of great films that Japan has released in recent years only intensifies the general misconception that Japanese classics are the only Japanese films that one should bother to watch. I see this misconception all the time, and the main reason this misconception exists is due to incompetent DVD distribution for modern Japanese films. If Criterion really wanted to release a Japanese film from the year 2013, they could have chosen something like . . . Miss Zombie – which is an art-house horror film that's right up their alley; it's glacially paced and shot in black-and-white for goodness sakes! Miss Zombie is one of the best horror films of the last 30 years, but few Americans have heard about it because companies like Criterion choose to release films like Jellyfish Eyes instead. The cinematic "opportunity cost" here is enormous.
Reviewed by

Reviewed by Jeremy_Urquhart 5 / 10

Never seen anything like it before, I guess?

How to describe Jellyfish Eyes? I guess it's a kid's movie about Tamagotchi sort of things that come to life, or maybe they're better described as extra ugly Pokémon. There's a whole conspiracy plot where the monsters were designed for an evil purpose. It gets weirdly dark at points. It gets very boring at points. At other times, it's so nuts it kind of feels fun. I guess it's creative and unique, but it's very messy.

I wanted to give this movie a fair chance. It has a pretty terrible reputation, to put it mildly. I imagined people were being overly critical, because at a first glance, it looked weird, rather than bad. And most people will likely appreciate that weird does not equal bad. I was hoping it might be the good kind of weird, or at least just the neutral kind of weird (can weird be neutral? Maybe I'm stretching this now).

And for a point, it does just feel like a really odd kid's movie. It was kind of tolerable. But after the first maybe 40 minutes, it becomes a tonal nightmare. It has no idea what it wants to be, and the genre-hopping is more awkward than fun or thrilling. The second act is dire.

There's a giant monster near the end. That was fun. I like big monsters in movies. It had me thinking maybe this wasn't the worst thing ever. I mean, of course it's not. Some of it's watchable. Some of the bizarre stuff is entertaining because it's bizarre. But the film as a whole... the execution is way off. My heart's telling me to give it a 2.5/5 for the novelty, but my head says it probably deserves less.

Read more IMDb reviews

2 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment