Assuming you don't expect any sort of reasonable, cohesive, remotely plausible plot, and have no expectation of either an Army Ranger or a Seal team being remotely competent, and have a deep appreciation of wooden acting, well then... This is the movie for you. Otherwise, it's laughbly bad.

Bad guy: "We have them surrounded" Soldier: "Sir, we are completely surrounded" Cutter narrating: "We were completely surrounded"

And using the same scene where someone is shooting, not twice, but six times in 30 seconds.

That is the kind of quality you can expect in the first few minutes of this movie alone.

Add a bunch of old stock footage of war scenes and fighter jets and you have a good view of the movie.

I was looking at it, asking myself if this was meant to be serious. Seems I am not alone in this. Would be great if this is some student project or something close to Hot Shots. I cant imagine it being anything else than an action comedy.

Want a good laugh, give it a try.

Pretty much when you see a bunch of reviews saying "this movie is not really bad, it's just a spoof," what that really means is this movie's bad. I had three deep thoughts:

1. This is a production of a contemporary Bulgarian film studio? Do they have a limited budget for uniforms? When you see a character credit as "Stock," why bother scrolling it? Oh, and the 80's called, they want their music back.

2. I was willing to give this benefit of the doubt, until they went with the flashback summary montage sequence - 38 minutes into the film. 38 minutes? Is the guy actually melancholy crooning, "Search and Destroy..."

3. I won't question why the film was released in 2020 but the director apparently passed away in 2015. But I am mildly curious why this film doesn't have an MPAA certificate number at the end credits. Did they not think it was worth it either?