Spider-Man: Lotus

2023

Action / Drama / Sci-Fi

15
IMDb Rating 3.1/10 10 2949 2.9K

nazi heroes spider-man acción ambiental drama accion

Please enable your VPΝ when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPΝ, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Guard VPΝ

Plot summary

Peter Parker, who is struggling to recover from the loss of Gwen Stacy and contemplating hanging up the suit for good, until he receives a letter from a terminally ill child, requesting that Spider-Man pay a visit before he passes away.

Director

Gavin J. Konop Photo
Gavin J. Konop

Top cast

Mariah Fox Photo
Mariah Fox as Ms. Harrison
Landon Konop Photo
Landon Konop as Young Peter Parker / Spider-Man
Tristan Lawrence Photo
Tristan Lawrence as Newscaster
Maxwell Fox Photo
Maxwell Fox as Tim Harrison
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
1.08 GB
1280*720
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles es  
24 fps
2 hr 0 min
Seeds 15
2 GB
1920*1080
English 2.0
NR
Subtitles es  
24 fps
2 hr 0 min
Seeds 18

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by TheSmithySmith 3 / 10

F

I will not, in this review, be addressing the controversy surrounding the people behind this film and their recorded racism/sexism. Because even going in to this film without any potential bias against it, it still fails.Spider-Man: Lotus is a movie. Many dismiss criticisms of it under the pretense that it is a small student project and not an actual movie, but I adamantly reject that notion. It has a budget of $25,000. It has a runtime of two hours (meaning it's not even the shortest Spider-Man film). With the status of being a feature length indie film with a respectable indie budget, there comes expectations; it is very much within reason to expect this movie to be well-directed, well-written, well-shot, and above all, economic in its production. Spider-Man: Lotus is none of these things.This movie is unpleasant on the eyes; the directing is deeply uninspired, shots being comprised almost always of very drab imagery that do not grab one's attention. Similarly, the movie is also unpleasant on the ears and brain; the script only shows slight potential just once or twice, and the entire runtime is a plodding chore to get through with a motionless story that numbs the senses at its best infuriates at its worst.When Spider-Man: Lotus was first announced, the filmmakers affirmed their fans that they were going to work within the confines of their budgetary limitations by shooting a drama first and foremost; the typical hallmarks of what makes a superhero movie would not be a priority. This is not what they did. There are still two superhero-y fight/action scenes in the movie; they are both distractingly terrible. These, along with a few other severely misguided creative decisions, chew through much of the budget that should've been used in other, smarter ways.Spider-Man: Lotus is not a good film. At best, it is still very much subpar. It had all the tools and ingredients necessary to be an incredible version of itself, but it used them either incorrectly or not at all. To those that still feel this is all too much to expect of a film of this size, here are some other movies whose budgets were at or below that of Lotus:El Mariachi (1992) with a budget of $7,000Primer (2004) with a budget of $7,000Paranormal Activity (2007) with a budget of $15,000Resolution (2012) with a budget of $20,000Creep (2014) with a budget of $0One Cut of the Dead (2017) with a budget of $25,000.
Reviewed by

Reviewed by saintswickfc 3 / 10

A Snoozefest

Such a slog. Utterly dragged by flashbacks and drawn-out dialogue scenes. Very little actual Spider-Man.

It strays from a conventional story structure, much to this film's detriment, even if it's what the filmmakers were going for. All I can say is, learn the rules before you break them. Very little setup and payoff in this film, resulting in extreme boredom. The group I watched it with was not invested at all in the characters or the plot. Please, learn the fundamentals of writing before starting such an ambitious project.

Glad to see fans make content like this, but sad to see it executed so poorly.

Read more IMDb reviews

21 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment