OK, the acting, direction and production values are below average. But the writing is above average and that is why this film gets a 6. I have seen several commie movies from the fifties, and most of them have better production values. However, the scripts for these often entertaining films is usually the same; the commies are the bad guys and the American government officials are the good guys; a simple case of black and white. Unfortunately, most of the things in life are not simple black and white issues. There is no pancake so flat that it does not have two sides. Instead of using stereotypes with predictable plot development and a pat ending, this film, at least, avoided half of those shortcomings. It is an intelligent look at the motives of members of the communist party in the US. The characters are complex and realistic, not cartoonish black and white characters portrayed in the vast majority of red scare films of the fifties. Even though the film had a weak conclusion, the rest of the film was very entertaining.

Most of the other reviews here fall into two groups: anti-communists like it, to one degree or another; pro-communists or anti-anti-communists hate it.

One, from a supposed relative of that excellent director, R. G. Springsteen, sneers at it, claiming the director called it his worst film. If Mr. Springsteen hated it, then he would not have done his best on it.

In fact, despite the actors not being well known, they -- most of them -- gave very good performances.

Nathan Scott, credited with the music, gets my respect for his use of "The Internationale" sprinkled suitably throughout the film.

The writers also did generally good work, though I have one hesitation: The leaders of the Communist Party, U. S. A., were shown to be very cynical, not very strong or honest believers in their party.

Some years ago, I worked at university radio station, and our manager, Tom Duval, was like that: He would go out to some individuals or groups to raise money, then come back and laugh at the suckers who gave.

But I can't help thinking members and leaders of the Communist Party were as sincere as members of other political parties -- even though the CPUSA was, in fact, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the CPUSSR, getting its orders and much of its money from Moscow.

(The CPUSA was, it is important to remember, also used for espionage and sabotage, as well, especially in Hollywood, to propagandize. Look at, for example, how its "keep out of the European conflict" changed, literally over night, when Hitler invaded the Soviet Union. Then the CPUSA was "this is a people's war and we need to fight.")

Some of the Hollywood people who joined the CPUSA, especially the ones who quit and who testified before the congressional committee, said the party seemed to offer solutions to such problems as poverty and unemployment.

In fact, just as did Al Capone, the CPUSA set up soup kitchens for the hungry.

Of course it intended to recruit members. And maybe that was a bit cynical. But advocates of even the most evil systems, including Nazism and communism, were probably as sincere, were probably true believers, as members of other parties and advocates of other causes.

Just not very clear-eyed.

Well, some want to make fun of the ending, of course, but I like it. It seems very Texan to me. At least for 1950.

"The Red Menace" must be viewed in the context of its times. If I were the president of Republic, I would make some changes, though relatively minor changes. As it is, I give it a recommendation, with that caveat: Remember the times, and that the Soviet Union and its alleged communist belief system was the imperialist enemy of these United States. And, in fact, of the peace and freedom of all Earth.

There is a too-dark print at YouTube.