So firstly,this movie has at least three separate titles. Which in itself is horrible, because how you market?! Or even find the movie if it's not right for you to choose on the moment? If this is the original title of the movie then the other two are Confined and 2149: The Aftermath, in case information is needed.

The movie itself is fairly solid. It has all the structure to pull most people through to the end. Nice casting, good locations and sets, decent overall acting, plot keeps the interest there, and kudos cameras and effects. But that's where the good stops. I'm not going to thrash this movie to death, just state facts. The plot is riddled with hole and dead ends. No true reasoning any history accept the bombs, but that was quite flimsy also. The main character y barely grounded in any way and many parts of his story is very disconnected!

Overall I was going to give it a 5/10 but then there was the little at the end that presented a , "Light at the end of the tunnel", scenario. Seems like a repolished Senior College Project.

This is editor turned newb director Benjamin Duffield's first full length feature film, written by actor Robert Higden in his first full length feature screenplay, and I must say, for newb filmmakers, this was a well shot film that will captivate you and hold your attention.

Although the premise is sci-fi, there's a little sappy romance thrown in, of which blends in nicely. The 77 min runtime flew by, even with the somewhat slow pacing. I would've liked to have seen more substance and/or some sub-plots, as well as some action thrown into the story, as that would've elevated this film to a higher level. I will say that the story is still unique in many ways, and certainly thought-provoking.

The cinematography and setting/landscapes were on point, and the score spot-on for a low budget B-film. The S/VFX were well done for a low budget. The performances were great, although I wasn't keen on the narrated voice. It was portraying Darwin, but clearly there was no way that would ever be his voice. Had they actually used Darwin's voice, it would've made a huge difference for the better. For that matter, even the dialogue and voice could've been better for the "World Authority". Overall a decent and entertaining watch, especially if you're a post-apocalyptic-sci-fi film fan. It's a well deserved 7.5/10 rounded up to 8 for the new filmmakers. Hopefully they take advantage of the potential for a Part 2.

I would suppose this has a low rating because it's cerebral fiction and doesn't have enough action/adventure to appease today's adrenaline junkies. Further, zero bad language, no nudity, no violence. Most unusual for a post-apocalyptic sci fi film

This film has a great premise, good writing, good directing, good acting, music, and great use of limited scenery. A slow-burner for sure, but post-apocalyptic doesn't have to be Mad Max. Sometimes it's just people adapting.

I can't got into the strengths and weaknesses without spoilers, so suffice to say that the plot generally makes good, logical sense. Some people complain about 'missing information' but they haven't thought through the concept of a war that destroyed most of humanity, the remaining government trying to retain a viable workforce / civilization (as meager as it is), and survivors just trying to get by day to day (without going on sadistic rampages).

On the downside, the movie would have been better without narration... giving the audience a chance to figure a few things out. One doesn't have to know all the background details to understand the life the characters have been thrown in to. Remove the narration, it would have been a better, more immersive film.

This is a movie about people adapting to the needs of everyday life and discovering more about that life as time passes. Science fiction isn't always about giant robots and planet-conquering aliens. Sometimes great science fiction is just about people.