Certainly, "Washington's Armor" is a captivating cinematic experience that delves into the pre-presidential life of George Washington, offering viewers a fresh perspective on the historical figure. The film not only presents a compelling storyline but also serves as an educational journey, shedding light on lesser-known aspects of Washington's early life.

One of the standout features of the movie is its meticulous attention to historical accuracy, bringing to life the events that shaped Washington before he assumed the role of the nation's first President. The narrative unfolds seamlessly, providing viewers with insights into the challenges and triumphs that molded the character of young Washington. This historical depth adds a layer of authenticity, making the film not just entertaining but also informative.

The portrayal of young Washington by the lead actor deserves commendation. His nuanced performance captures the essence of the iconic figure, bringing out the complexities of Washington's character during his formative years. The actor's commitment to the role is evident in every scene, creating a connection between the audience and the historical persona. The success of the movie heavily relies on the actor's ability to convey the internal struggles and growth of Washington, and he does so with finesse.

The viewer's anticipation for the second part of the movie is a testament to the success of "Washington's Armor." The film leaves audiences eager to witness the continuation of Washington's journey, creating a sense of investment in the character's evolution. The strategic decision to release the story in multiple parts adds an element of suspense, ensuring that viewers remain engaged with the narrative.

In conclusion, "Washington's Armor" emerges as a well-crafted historical drama that goes beyond entertainment to offer an enlightening exploration of George Washington's early life. The combination of a compelling storyline, outstanding performances, gripping war scenes, and visually striking snowscapes elevates the film to a must-watch status. As audiences eagerly await the sequel, it is evident that this cinematic portrayal of a founding father has successfully left a lasting impression on viewers, merging history with the art of storytelling.

I can hardly believe that this movie has such high ratings. Have people actually watched this movie? Here is an honest review from someone who has no patriotic obligations towards the US of A! The story line was boring. The acting was atrocious, along with the accents. Two 'actors' attempt of a Scottish accent, were especially dire. The cinematography was reasonable, but everything else, like costumes were too clean and new looking, and cheaply made. If this is the first installment of what could potentially be a series of movies, then this beginning is where it ends for me! I do not recommend at all.

The script for Washington's Armor is reminiscent of Charles Portis' original True Grit. The writers Labrizzi, Sabatine and Director Tammy Lane capture the ambience of 16th Century Virginia with formal English vernacular and mannerisms. It's a truly great script and story; it makes you wonder what a cast of big time actors and more dramatic cinematography could have produced. If the history is accurate, the storyline is truly an education. Washington begins his military career in the British Army and he is portrayed as something of a dandy. He proudly displays his dancing prowess with a minuet, but soon finds himself schooled by the commoners, corrupt politicians, and enemies of the Crown.

Flashbacks of a young Washington with his father, Augustine, played by a miscast Wayne Matychuk offer insight into George's education and development, but they are abrupt, sappy and poorly done. Clever dialogue between the two characters is lost in the presentation. The script and story overcome most of the weaknesses in what must have been a minimal budget. At first, I thought this was a series, and it should be. An abrupt ending left me expecting more. I hope the producers will continue Washington's saga with a casting upgrade, Director Tammy Lane does a great job with the verbal interaction of the characters that results in a time machine-like view of nascent America. I know it's a lot to ask but some Coppola/Terrence Mann style lighting and scene composition could have resulted in a classic. Wille Mellina provides a credible but uninspired picture of young Washington. Tim Perez-Ross gives an excellent performance as Christopher Gist, Washington's guide and translator. There is not enough of Martha Washington and too much of Sally Fairfax a Virginia nobleman's wife. Her presence is suggestive and confusing. Tammy Lane manages to overcome such failures with clever scenes like Washington requesting the "parking valet" at a party to retrieve his horse. She incorporates the weather, the geography and the politics in a slowly developing conflict. The second half of the story offers some mystery and much needed action. I don't get the title Washington's Armor. This historical piece is worth watching because of the script. Tis' a joy to listen too, and after all is done "the work remains with us," a favorite saying of Washington's father.